Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Dinkle v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons and National Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seabrooke v. Inch et al
as 2:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Seabrooke, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark S. Inch and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00103
Defendant:
B Smith, Stanley, Loveless and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy v. Warden et al
as 4:2018cv00159
Defendant:
Warden and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
James Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rave-Estrada v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Rave-Estrada
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appolon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Ernst Appolon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yanes v. McManus et al
as 2:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Alicio Yanes
Defendant:
Wendy McManus, Suzanne Hastings, Regional Director and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Prisoner Petition
Pearson v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Bradley Allen Pearson
Defendant:
(FNU) White, Suzanne Hastings, (FNU) (LNU) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 5:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Colin Rose
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
Terry N. Taylor
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Suzanne Hastings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
