Cases 1 - 10 of 581
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Collins, Dr. A. Acevedo, Michelle Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neel et al
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
C. Neel, C. Burnett, Nunes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales Jr. v. Nababi et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Nababi, Kelly Johnson, K. Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. Reed et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Bernard Reed, Mark Perkins, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tollick et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
S. Tollick, C. Wynn, J. McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsboro v. Ivey et al
as 6:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Goldsboro, II
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Major Torquado, Jennifer Leca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
