Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cherry v. Ruskin et al
as 3:2020cv03135
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Emily Ruskin, Kess Roberson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03264
Defendant:
Kess Roberson, John Baldwin, Patrick T. Singleton and others
Plaintiff:
Howard W Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie v. Roberson et al
as 3:2019cv03253
Defendant:
Elise Bauer, Leonta Jackson, Lisa Hopp and others
Plaintiff:
Kenny Leslie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Roberson et al
as 3:2019cv03241
Defendant:
Kess Roberson, Leonta Jackson, Illinois Dept of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03097
Defendant:
Kess Roberson, Leonta Jackson, John Doe, II and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, LaTosha Charles, Morgan Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. IDOC et al
as 3:2018cv00497
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Smith
Defendant:
IDOC, Matthew Swalls, Kess Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jared Smith v. Lieutenant Walsh, et al
as 17-3369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARED M. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WALSH, Lincoln Correctional Center, OFFICER PFEIFFER, Lincoln Correctional Center and KESS ROBERSON, Lincoln Correctional Center
Jared Smith v. Kess Roberson, et al
as 17-3370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARED M. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KESS ROBERSON and L. HOPP, HCUA Head of Healthcare Unit
John Trice v. Correctional Officer Gresham, et al
as 17-1431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN TRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GRESHAM, Lincoln Correctional Center and KESS ROBERSON, Warden, Lincoln Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
