Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. McCray et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Fred F Perez
Defendant:
McCray, Shelton, Susan Shebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Szul et al
as 1:2023cv15969
Plaintiff:
Wynton P. Steward and Wynton P Stewart
Defendant:
R. Szul, G. Perez 03, C. Deanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enochs v. Bocknak et al
as 1:2023cv14811
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debrante Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Haine, A. Bocknak, F. Byndum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barghouti v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50327
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy, Susan Tuell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adair v. Warden Adams et al
as 1:2023cv03502
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adair
Defendant:
Warden Adams, Sgt. Wehr, Sgt. Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz-Perez v. Kinnick et al
as 3:2023cv50173
Plaintiff:
Bernard Diaz-Perez
Defendant:
Mr. Kinnick, Mr. Moissant, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGruder v. Perez et al
as 1:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Tony McGruder
Defendant:
Victor M. Perez, K. Young, J. Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
