Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON et al v. CITY OF ASHBURN
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Decina Peterson, Donald Maurice Madison Sr. and DONALD MAURICE MADISON, SR
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison Sr. et al v. City of Ashburn
as 2:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
Decina Peterson and Donald Maurice Madison Sr.
Defendant:
City of Ashburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00356
Defendant:
OFFICER MCCOLLUMS, OFFICER PEAVY and WARDEN FORD
Plaintiff:
ADAM PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Medical Center/Staff and Chatham County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Asland Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Medical Staff/ Center and Chatham County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Asland Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMTIH v. TAYLOR et al
as 5:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
H T SMTIH
Defendant:
CEDRIC TAYLOR and KEN PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. PETERSON
as 5:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYATT v. EVANS et al.
as 4:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LAMONT WYATT
Defendant:
TWANDA EVANS, TEANA NELSON, MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL and others
Respondent:
BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYATT v. GRIGGS et al
as 4:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WYATT
Defendant:
FELISHA GRIGGS, ALLEN THRASHER, LENARD WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
