Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chong Lee v. City of Appleton, Wisconsin, et al
as 21-1310
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CARRIE SCHNEIDER, MICHAEL GOSTISHA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHONG L. LEE
Sims v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv04618
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Raba, Peter Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims et al v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv10767
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims, Burundi Antonio Martin, Larry D Woods and others
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv07124
Plaintiff:
Chevalier Barnes
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Raba, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv09459
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Nicholson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Director Raba, Juan Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dart et al
as 1:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Terrance Smith
Defendant:
Thomas Dart , Salvador Godinez , Supt. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv07909
Plaintiff:
Milton Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Head of Matainence for Div. #5), John M Raba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv07711
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jimmie Brown
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Illinois and John M. Raba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Dart et al
as 1:2008cv02037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Howard
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John M. Raba, Ruth M. Rothstein and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2007cv00544
Plaintiff:
John E Taylor, Jr, John E Taylor, Jr and John E Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
Sergio Rodriguez, John Raba, Harriet Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
