Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Jones v. Kemp et al
as 4:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Jones and George Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, Commissioner, Chairman Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DIRECTOR RICK JACOBS, VICE CHAIRMAN BRIAN OWENS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY L BARNARD, JAMES MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browner v. Fountain et al
as 6:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Antonio Browner
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Homer Bryson, Doug Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIRKLAND v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KIRKLAND
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON STATE PRISON, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browner v. Fountain et al
as 6:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Antonio Browner
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Homes Bryson, Doug Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Coffee County Facility et al
as 5:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
Coffee County Facility, Corrections Corporation of America, Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Karpf et al
as 4:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Matthew Washington
Defendant:
Michael Karpf and State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2014cv03856
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Brian Kemp, Samuel Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
