Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Guzman v. Allenby et al
as 1:2014cv01872
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Guzman
Defendant:
Cliff Allenby, Audrey King, Tom Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sipe et al v. King et al
as 4:2014cv03990
Plaintiff:
Howard Sipe and Stephen Wilson
Defendant:
Audrey King, Cliff Allenby, Tom Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Cate et al
as 1:2011cv01111
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darrell Miller
Defendant:
Matthew Cate , George Giurbino , Robert Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keenan Wilkins v. Gary Picetti, et al
as 11-16140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY PICETTI, Judge, Superior Court Alameda County, MICHAEL GAFFEY, Judge, Superior Court Alameda County, JAMES MANN, Public Defender Alameda County and others
Kindred v. CA Dept. of Mental Health et al
as 1:2011cv00421
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Kindred
Defendant:
CA Dept. of Mental Health, CA Office of Patients' Rights, Office of Human Rights and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbs v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2010cv02218
Plaintiff:
Norman Hubbs
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg and Pamela Ahlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2010cv01530
Plaintiff:
Oscar W Jones
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Pam Ahlin, Jerry Kasdorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Picetti
as 5:2010cv02818
Plaintiff:
Keenan G. Wilkins
Defendant:
Gary Picetti, Michael Gaffey, James Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Picetti
as 4:2010cv02818
Plaintiff:
Keenan G. Wilkins
Defendant:
Gary Picetti, Michael Gaffey, James Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansfield R. Brown v. Ahlin et al (Civil Detainee)
as 1:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mansfield R. Brown
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin and Stephen Mayberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
