Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Wallace v. Hale et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
Danielle Hale, Karyn Conner and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wallace v. Donault et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
P Donault and . Georgeff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, . Bartucci and . Krumweide
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Lawrence DeWayne Wallace
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wallace et al
as 3:2023cv03281
Plaintiff:
Dayne Woods
Defendant:
Dax Wallace, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Kankakee County Jail
as 2:2023cv02199
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
Kankakee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Bartucci et al
as 2:2023cv02155
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
. Bartucci and . Krumweide
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammons v. Santerelli et al
as 1:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ammons, Jr
Defendant:
Dale Santerelli, Vincent Perillo, David J. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
