Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Reed v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jasper Reed and Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Wallace
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Young v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Tramell Deon Young
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morel v. Pearce et al
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Kevin Pearce, James Adams, Nathan Tussey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Christopher James Davila
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McLaughlin v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brooke Aaron McLaughlin
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Agent Parr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
