Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamonte, Jr. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr. and Al-Kareem-Khalil
Defendant:
Special Agent Matthew Pierce, G.D.C. Criminal Investigation Division, G.D.C. Office of Professional Standards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURROUGHS et al v. HILL et al
as 5:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
TORRES ANTWAN BURROUGHS and SHEILA DENISE BURROUGHS
Defendant:
HILL, FOSTER, STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00407
Plaintiff:
TYRECQUISS SHAEWAUN WELLS
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, WARDEN REGINA WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASS v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AARON VASS
Defendant:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00374
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AARON VASS
Defendant:
Warden WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN REGINA WHOMBLE, CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTBROOKS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00192
Defendant:
MARTIN ERIC, BALDWIN STATE PRISON, WARDEN LAWRENCE EASELEY and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WESTBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00081
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, CO2 ERIKA SHINHOLSTER, REGENIA WOMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITSCHELL v. BERRY
as 1:2019cv00089
Defendant:
MR ALLS, Warden WALTER BERRY and MS BANKS
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MICHAEL MITSCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
