Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sanchez v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Jesus Sanchez
Defendant:
Teri Kennedy, David Kennedy, J Kraznacion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2020cv01377
Plaintiff:
Michael W Harris and Ky
Defendant:
Susanne Prentice, John Doe #1, . Whitecotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv01397
Defendant:
L Whitecotton, Edmund Lewis, . Vilt and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Leininger et al
as 1:2019cv01365
Defendant:
. Henkel, . Torres, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2018cv01437
Defendant:
FNU Eden, FNU Whitecotton, FNU Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce et al v. Fox et al
as 1:2018cv01324
Defendant:
Kim Fox, Gov. Bruce Rauner, Lisa Madigan and others
Plaintiff:
Davion Morgan and Anthony Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Grady, Sr. v. Nathon Bennett, et al
as 17-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. GRADY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHON BENNETT, Warehouse Supervisor, SHAWN WHITECOTTON, Unicor Plant Manager, M. WINN, Warehouse Manager and others
Kevin L. Grady, Sr. v. Nathon Bennett, et al
as 17-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. GRADY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHON BENNETT, SHAWN WHITECOTTON, M. WINN and others
David Bentz v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrator of Pontiac Correctional Center, JAMES S. BLACKARD, Major at Pontiac Correctional Center, SUSAN PRENTICE, Lieutenant and others
Germaine Elcock v. Lance Whitecotton, et al
as 10-3702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERMAINE A. ELCOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCE WHITECOTTON, LINCOLN ROTH, MARY SIGLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
