Cases 101 - 110 of 830
Fulson v. Dart, as Sheriff of Cook County et al
as 1:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
Maurice Fulson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, as Sheriff of Cook County and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Arrington v. Donathan
as 4:2022cv04081
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
Greg Donathan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Cook County Chief Judge et al
as 4:2022cv04072
Plaintiff:
Maceo G Willis, Jr
Defendant:
Cook County Chief Judge, Cook County Circuit Court Judge, IL Attorney General of Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyjak v. Doe
as 3:2022cv03056
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latko v. Oesar et al
as 4:2022cv04033
Plaintiff:
Edward Latko
Defendant:
Beth Oesar, Pamela Bredt, Hughes Lochard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyjak v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv03020
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Corey Reed, Harvey Daniels, Tracey Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurland v. Winks
as 4:2022cv04046
Plaintiff:
Shane Kurland
Defendant:
Timothy Winks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields et al v. Liberty Health Care Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv04050
Plaintiff:
Justin Fields, Dothan K Rogers, Lester J Collier and others
Defendant:
Liberty Health Care Corporation, Steve Bryant, Josh Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Halmark et al
as 4:2022cv04037
Plaintiff:
Mario Diaz
Defendant:
. Halmark, Todd Moody, . Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burger v. Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
as 4:2022cv04006
Plaintiff:
David Burger
Defendant:
Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
