Cases 151 - 160 of 408
Telucci v. Withrow et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Richard Telucci
Defendant:
Richard Withrow and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osolinski v. Correctional Officer assigned as a Transportation Officer at Pleasant Valley State Prison (John Doe 1) et al
as 1:2015cv01884
Plaintiff:
David N. Osolinski
Defendant:
Correctional Officer assigned as a Transportation Officer at Pleasant Valley State Prison (John Doe 1), Correctional Officer assigned as a Transportation Officer at Pleasant Valley State Prison (John Doe 2), Administrator of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (John Doe 3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Kramer et al
as 1:2015cv01868
Plaintiff:
Jesse Sanchez
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cranford v. Dirige et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Plaintiff:
Archie Cranford
Defendant:
Teressita Dirige, Kathleen O'Brian, Pam Ahlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Consiglio v. Withdrow
as 1:2015cv01804
Plaintiff:
Sam Consiglio, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Withdrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arcelus v. Mimms
as 1:2015cv01783
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Arcelus
Defendant:
Margaret Mimms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronje v. Kramer, et al.
as 1:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
Edward Ronje
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trebas v. DeBruin et al
as 1:2015cv01737
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trebas
Defendant:
Joe DeBruin, David Fennell, David Pomaville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kramer, et al.
as 1:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
Herman Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallworth v. Kramer et al
as 1:2015cv01690
Plaintiff:
Levell Stallworth
Defendant:
Norm Kramer, Pam Ahlin, Audrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
