Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Loupe et al v. Unknown Staffs et al
as 4:2017cv04322
Plaintiff:
Steven Loupe, William Nelson and Jerry A Reynolds, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Staffs and Unknown Residents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2017cv04293
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Hughes Lochard and Unknown & Unnamed Defendants
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houtsma v. Unknown Defendant
as 2:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
John Glenn Houtsma
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houtsma v. Unknown Defendant
as 2:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Glenn Houtsma
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04228
Plaintiff:
Greg White
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzpatrick v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04226
Plaintiff:
Martin Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Racanelli v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04110
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Racanelli
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Eric Kunkel, James C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ulmer v. Malis et al
as 1:2017cv02084
Plaintiff:
Lynn Ulmer
Defendant:
Richard Malis, Elgin Mental Health Center, Daniel Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmy Lurz v. Joseph Hankins, et al
as 17-1499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMMY LURZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HANKINS, Public Service Administrator, SHAN JUMPER, Clinical Director, SHARLENE CARAWAY, Associate Clinical Director and others
Racanelli v. Hankins et al
as 4:2017cv04074
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Racanelli
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, Paula Lodge and Any and all other unnamed or unknown persons to have participated in the violations complained herein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
