Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Sullivan v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2024cv04019
Plaintiff: Anthony Sullivan
Defendant: Aramark Food Services Corp, . Coates, . Kuldfelt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Powers v. Aramark Food Services Corp., et al
as 22-2951
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee: ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, ASHLEY ADWELL and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Powers v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2022cv04130
Plaintiff: Thomas Powers
Defendant: Aramark Food Services Corp, Ashley Adwell and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Halmark et al
as 4:2022cv04037
Plaintiff: Mario Diaz
Defendant: . Halmark, Todd Moody, . Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montanez v. Wexford Healthcare Inc et al
as 4:2021cv04053
Defendant: Aramark Incorporated, Liberty Healthcare Inc., Shan Jumper and others
Plaintiff: Jose Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. McCoy et al
as 4:2019cv04135
Plaintiff: Thomas Powers
Defendant: Jane Doe, Eric Kunkel, Ashley McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Hou et al
as 4:2019cv04119
Defendant: Sharon Coleman, Gregg Scott, Aramark, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacKintosh v. Aramark, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04095
Defendant: Ashley McCoy, Verla Simmons, Nicole Atwater and others
Plaintiff: Curtis J MacKintosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Durant et al
as 4:2019cv04024
Defendant: P Morton, Markowitz, Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff: David L Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Scott et al
as 4:2019cv04014
Defendant: Shan Jumper, Steve Dredge, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Ronald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?