Cases 161 - 170 of 424
United States of America v. $123,192.14 in U.S. Currency and 237.53575 Digital Currency Bitcoins (Powers)
as 1:2015cv00854
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$123,192.14 in U.S. Currency and 237.53575 Digital Currency Bitcoins (Powers)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Carter v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00801
Plaintiff:
Andre Carter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Exum v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv00591
Plaintiff:
Xavier Stanley Exum
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
United States of America v. 1460 River Way Drive, Keymar, Maryland 21757 et al
as 1:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1460 River Way Drive, Keymar, Maryland 21757 and 2325 N. Feeser Road, Taneytown, Maryland 21787
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
George v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jacob George
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Malley v. USA
as 1:2015cv00432
Plaintiff:
Shawn Malley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Delrosario v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Mikhnail M. Delrosario
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
United States of America v. One Colt M4 Rifle
as 8:2014cv03897
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Colt M4 Rifle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $54,052.10 in U.S. Currency
as 8:2014cv03774
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$54,052.10 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Omar Kinnard Harmon and Denise Lorraine Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bracmort v. USA
as 8:2014cv03601
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Bracmort
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
