Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SACKOS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv01710
Defendant:
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA SACKOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stevenson Tan, et al v. California State Automobile A
as 08-57041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVENSON TAN, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, DEEPAK MATHUR, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, CLAUDIA ADAMS, an individual, on behalf of herself and all persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a California Corporation
Shaun Lee v. California State Prison of Los Angeles County (LAC) et al
as 2:2008cv07645
Plaintiff:
Shaun Lee and Shaun Lee
Defendant:
California State Prison of Los Angeles County (LAC) and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Edward Maciel v. City of Los Angele
as 08-55958
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD MACIEL, for and on behalf of himself, other employees similarly situated and the general public
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Amicus Curiae:
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES and INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Fred Bamonte, et al v. City of Mesa
as 08-16206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED BAMONTE, JAVIER COTA and RICARDO PERINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MESA, a body politic
Amicus Curiae:
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and others
Tan v. California State Automobile Association et al
as 8:2007cv01011
Plaintiff:
Stevenson Tan, Stevenson Tan and Stevenson Tan
Defendant:
California State Automobile Association and DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
