Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jaquish v. Center for the Disadvantaged et al
as 3:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
KELLY K. JAQUISH and Kelly K Jaquish
Defendant:
CENTER FOR THE DISADVANTAGED, ROSALIE K. NORTHERN and Rosalie K Northern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
PARTLOW v. ASHER
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
KELLY R. PARTLOW
Defendant:
JERRY ASHER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DUNCAN v. K & A DESIGN GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv02156
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE DUNCAN
Defendant:
K & A DESIGN GROUP, KELLY HEARON and ALMA BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KENNEDY v. PEOPLEFIRST HOMECARE & HOSPICE OF INDIANA, LLC
as 1:2019cv04799
Defendant:
PEOPLEFIRST HOMECARE & HOSPICE OF INDIANA, LLC
Plaintiff:
KELLI KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
THACKER et al v. ULTIMATE HOME SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2018cv02573
Plaintiff:
KRIS HALL, KELLY THACKER and KELLY COOPER
Defendant:
ULTIMATE HOME SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dykes v. Centurion Land Title et al
as 1:2016cv00353
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dykes
Defendant:
Centurion Land Title and Ruoff Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BASS et al v. CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA
as 3:2016cv00309
Defendant:
CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
AARON BASS , DAVID BAKER , ARWEN BHE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KELLY v. SKYBUS LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
CHRIS KELLY
Defendant:
SKYBUS LLC and SKYBUS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
ALFORD v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
KELLY R. ALFORD
Defendant:
CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA, LLC and CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GOODE v. CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2014cv00915
Defendant:
CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA, LLC and CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
Plaintiff:
KELLY GOODE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
