Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carr v. Murphy et al
as 1:2021cv10434
Defendant:
Homeless Not Hopeless, Inc., Alan Burt, Richard Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Carr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Owens et al v. City of Malden
as 1:2019cv11835
Defendant:
City of Malden
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Murphy, Jeffrey Drees, Scott Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abulzahab et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12658
Plaintiff:
Alie Soufan, Roy Gendron, Derek Thomas and others
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Nelson Chai, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Perez-Tejada et al v. Mattress Firm Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12448
Plaintiff:
Mack Perez-Tejada , Roy McElroy , Ashraf Meshriky and others
Defendant:
Mattress Firm Inc. , Kenneth E Murphy and Jim Black
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rocheville et al v. Trustees of Boston University
as 1:2017cv10313
Plaintiff:
Scott Rocheville , Brian G. Abdallah , Paul Arnold and others
Defendant:
Trustees of Boston University
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Hain et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2014cv13755
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hain , Brian Archibald , David Bean and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
James Santry v. Carpenters Union, Local 33 et al
as 1:2013cv12798
Plaintiff:
James Santry
Defendant:
Carpenters Union, Local 33 , John P. Murphy, Jr. , Christine Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parris et al v. Cabral
as 1:2013cv11010
Plaintiff:
Edwin Parris , James Antonetti , John Barry and others
Defendant:
Andrea J. Cabral
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hernandez et al v. Carew et al
as 1:2013cv10394
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hernandez , Arles Granados Lazo , Jose Ortez and others
Defendant:
Siobhan Carew, Jonathan Pell, Golden Apple, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
