Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thomas v. Bowman Electric Inc
as 5:2020cv00691
Defendant:
Bowman Electric Inc
Plaintiff:
David P Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
as 7:2015cv01409
Plaintiff:
Donald P Smith
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cordova et al v. R&A Oysters, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00462
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Fuentes Cordova and Leobardo Morales Inclan
Defendant:
R&A Oysters, Inc., Rodney L. Fox and Ann P. Fox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sims v. Techota LLC
as 7:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anna P Sims
Defendant:
Techota LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
as 1:2012cv03297
Defendant:
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lillie P Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01213
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pierre P Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rogers v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01500
Plaintiff:
Vanessa P Rogers
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lightsey v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
as 7:2012cv00451
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P Lightsey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Petty et al v. Process Automation and Simulation Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01559
Plaintiff:
Drew Petty and Jason K Samuel
Defendant:
Process Automation and Simulation Services Inc, Mark S McColl, Margie P Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
