Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Chan v. Secure Freight Systems (USA) Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Chan
Defendant:
Secure Freight Systems (USA) Inc, Maple Freight Partnership and Kit Bonnie Chu
Burnham v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Michael Burnham
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05317
Plaintiff:
Michael Burnham
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Roberts et al v. Sidwell Air Freight Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05912
Plaintiff:
Dakota Roberts and Dawn Marie Hacker
Defendant:
Sidwell Air Freight Inc, DHL Express USA Inc and DHL Express (USA) Inc doing business as DHL Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blankers et al v. Pushpay USA Inc
as 2:2021cv01549
Plaintiff:
Audra Blankers and W.B.T. Arnold
Defendant:
Pushpay USA, Inc and Pushpay USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Didzun v. The Home Depot Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01540
Plaintiff:
Richard James Didzun, Ian McAndrews and Kate McAndrews
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Home Depot USA, Inc., The Home Depot Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Suzuki et al v. Marinepolis USA Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01229
Plaintiff:
Daisaku Suzuki and Kazuya Omoto
Defendant:
Marinepolis U.S.A., Inc., Marinepolis Co., LDT, Mitsuyoshi Inohara and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chetwood et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2019cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kristina Chetwood and Sandra Castellon-Gonzalez
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Farley v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01185
Defendant:
Restaurant Revolution Technologies, Inc., Adecco USA Inc, Restaurant Revolution Technologies, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Farley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arline v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2014cv01741
Plaintiff:
Deborah Arline
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
