Cases 71 - 80 of 804
Rutledge v. Union Pacific RR Co.
as 4:2023cv00782
Defendant:
Union Pacific RR Co.
Plaintiff:
De'Ron Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Garrison v. A-10 Networks, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrison
Defendant:
A-10 Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Valle v. Plantgistix Sabine, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00898
Petitioner:
Cody Valle
Defendant:
Plantgistix Sabine, LLC and Quantix SCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHITAKER v. LEBUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 6:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
RONALD WHITAKER
Defendant:
LEBUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Saldana v. Mesilla Valley Transportation Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Erica Saldana
Defendant:
Mesilla Valley Transportation Solutions, LLC, OEP Holdings, LLC, MVT Transportation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McWilliams v. Enlink Midstream Operating LP et al
as 3:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Lance Wade McWilliams
Defendant:
Enlink Midstream Operating, LP, James Wayne Blalack, Stacy Ann Szabla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Henson v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Henson
Defendant:
Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. and DG Distribution of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
McTorry v. Nexus Health Systems, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04479
Plaintiff:
Chase McTorry
Defendant:
Nexus Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Phillips v. City of Rusk, Texas
as 6:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Phillips
Defendant:
City of Rusk, Texas
Not Classified By Court:
Andy Tindel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Delaney v. A.J. Hurt, Jr., Inc.
as 4:2022cv04060
Plaintiff:
Ashlea Delaney
Defendant:
A.J. Hurt, Jr., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
