Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gabbard v. Butler County, Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Angela Gabbard
Defendant:
Butler County, Ohio, Judge Robert H Lyons, Judge Kevin C MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smoot v. Three-C Body Shops, Inc.
as 2:2020cv04223
Defendant:
Three-C Body Shops, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smoot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
McCullum v. KDM Signs, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00615
Defendant:
KDM Signs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eddie C. McCullum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Corrin v. C & J Clark Retail, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv01855
Defendant:
C & J Clark Retail, Inc. and Rob Parks
Plaintiff:
Joshua Corrin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Freiling v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Ohio, Inc. d/b/a Nation Cash Advance c/o CSC lawyers Incorporating Services
as 2:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Mary Freiling
Defendant:
Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Ohio, Inc. d/b/a Nation Cash Advance c/o CSC lawyers Incorporating Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Easter v. Beacon Tri-State Staffing, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Brian Easter
Defendant:
Beacon Tri-State Staffing, Inc. and C*MAC Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Edwards v. Midwest Transatlantic Lines, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01385
Plaintiff:
Clyde C Edwards
Defendant:
Midwest Transatlantic Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Stein v. Atlas Industries, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Stein
Defendant:
Atlas Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Gay v. Global Precision Parts, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Edward C Gay
Defendant:
Global Precision Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Walker v. B & C Research Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Robert M Walker
Defendant:
B & C Research Inc. , Darlene Dixon , Jackie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
