Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Worsham v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00331
Defendant:
Anthony Chaney, Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Plaintiff:
Anna Worsham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Worsham v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02481
Defendant:
Anthony Chaney and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anna Worsham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Hazzard v. Lakeside Building Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02646
Plaintiff:
Broderick Hazzard
Defendant:
Anthony Cassese and Lakeside Building Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Gonzalez v. Continental Structural Plastics, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01738
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gonzalez
Defendant:
Continental Structural Plastics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Schobert et al v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony Schobert, Mr. John York and Anthony Schobert
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc and CSX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Sims v. CPC Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sims
Defendant:
CPC Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Scott vs. Riffle Machine Works
as 2:2017cv00624
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott
Defendant:
RIFFLE MACHINE WORKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Taylor v. Glazers Distributors of Ohio
as 2:2016cv01121
Plaintiff:
Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
Glazers Distributors of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Smith v. Jefferson Behavioral Health System et al
as 2:2016cv00883
Plaintiff:
Denise L Smith
Defendant:
Jefferson Behavioral Health System and Anthony J. Sheposh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Gillum v. Welcome House, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02182
Plaintiff:
Danelle Nichole Gillum
Defendant:
Welcome House, Inc. , Anthony Thomas , Janine Eterovich and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
