Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Lindsey v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lindsey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
James v City of Urbana et al
as 2:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
LeShawn James
Defendant:
City of Urbana, Diane Wolfe Marlin, Demond Dade and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hempen v. City of Nashville, Illinois
as 3:2022cv03133
Plaintiff:
Michael Hempen
Defendant:
City of Nashville, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Lindsey v. City of Chicago
as 1:2021cv03156
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Avila v. Tri City Foods of Illinois LLC
as 1:2021cv01741
Plaintiff:
Yoselina Avila
Defendant:
Tri City Foods of Illinois LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abney v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
as 1:2020cv03621
Plaintiff:
Tariq Abney
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Board of Education of the City of Chicago doing business as City of Chicago School District 299 doing business as Chicago Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alesia v. Rhee et al
as 1:2019cv07576
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alesia
Defendant:
William Lonergan, City of Chicago, Phyllinis Easter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moser v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv06659
Defendant:
Randy Conner, CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO and The City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Brian Moser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teamer v. City Colleges of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv02821
Defendant:
Joyce Carson, Ronald Schofield, City Colleges of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Shaunese Teamer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
