Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Klumpp et al v. Uniloy, Inc.
as 4:2022cv11188
Plaintiff:
William Klumpp, Robert Lobbestael and Russel Straits
Defendant:
Uniloy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bice v. W.L. Molding of Michigan, LLC
as 1:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
William Bice
Defendant:
W.L. Molding of Michigan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Williams v. North Lansing Opco, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00826
Defendant:
North Lansing Opco, LLC and The Medilodge Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Holland v. Williams Form Engineering Corp
as 1:2018cv00604
Plaintiff:
Crystal Holland
Defendant:
Williams Form Engineering Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Williams v. Tim Hortons USA Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv10960
Plaintiff:
Colette Williams
Defendant:
Tim Hortons USA Inc., Mar Group Inc, Mar Orchard Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Oceana County Medical Care Facility
as 1:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Patricia Williams
Defendant:
Oceana County Medical Care Facility
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Kring v. Heritage Broadcasting Company of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
William E. Kring
Defendant:
Heritage Broadcasting Company of Michigan, Inc. , Heritage Broadcasting Group, Inc. and MICI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Raveendran v. Wayne State University et al
as 2:2015cv12197
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Raveendran
Defendant:
Wayne State University , Pierre Morris , William Murdoch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khodl v. Bradford White Corporation
as 1:2014cv01311
Plaintiff:
William Khodl
Defendant:
Bradford White Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 825
Williams v. Trinity Continuing Care Services et al
as 2:2014cv12703
Defendant:
Trinity Continuing Care Services and Trinity Health-Michigan
Plaintiff:
Joy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
