Cases 11 - 19 of 19
SARDINAS v. CRST EXPEDITED, INC.
as 1:2019cv20530
Defendant:
CRST EXPEDITED, INC.
Plaintiff:
AMED SARDINAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Christopher Dueker v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08751
Respondent:
CRST Expedited Inc
Petitioner:
Christopher Dueker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dueker v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 1:2018at00116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dueker
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dueker v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00381
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dueker
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jesus Perez v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jesus Perez
Defendant:
CRST International, Inc , CRST Expedited, Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curtis Markson et al v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Curtis Markson, Mark McGeorge, Eric Clark and others
Defendant:
CRST International, Inc., CRST Expedited, Inc. doing business as CRST The Transportation Solution Inc, Does 1-100, inclusive and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Curtis Markson et al v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04620
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, inclusive,, CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark McGeorge and Curtis Markson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Nicholas McNulty v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv02450
Defendant:
CRST Expedited Inc., CRST International, Inc., CRST Van Expedited, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas McNulty
Nicholas McNulty v. CRST Van Expedited Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00043
Defendant:
CRST Expedited Inc, CRST International Inc, CRST Van Expedited Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas McNulty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
