Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Powell v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powell
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Veronica Moreno v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
VERONICA MORENO
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Lisa Mosqueda v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., et al
as 22-55891
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LISA MOSQUEDA
Defendant / Appellant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Lisa Mosqueda v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., et al
as 22-55892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA MOSQUEDA
Defendant / Appellee:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Lisa Mosqueda v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., et al
as 22-55706
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LISA MOSQUEDA
Defendant / Appellant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Lisa Mosqueda v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2021cv04811
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mosqueda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Freeman v. Time Warner Cable Benefits Plan et al
as 1:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Richard Freeman
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Benefits Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
John Aquino v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc et al
as 2:2012cv10160
Plaintiff:
John Aquino
Defendant:
Does and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.