Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hawkins v. Ruby Tuesday Operations LLC, d/b/a Ruby Tuesday
as 5:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Lyndrell Hawkins
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday Operations LLC, d/b/a Ruby Tuesday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alexander v. Emrich et al
as 5:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Claude Young Alexander
Defendant:
John A. Emrich, Robert Nolan, David Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Corbin v. Criminal Justice Alternatives
as 5:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Kierra Corbin
Defendant:
Criminal Justice Alternatives d/b/a Re-Entry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gates v. Lejeune Motor Company
as 7:2020cv00138
Plaintiff:
Dena Gates
Defendant:
Lejeune Motor Company d/b/a Lejeune Honda Cars
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ELKINS V. MAIL TRANSPORT SERVICES,LLC., ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01118
Plaintiff:
IRAN ELKINS
Defendant:
MAIL TRANSPORT SERVICES, LLC , DOUGLAS D. CLINE, CHAD D. CLINE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Gonzalez v. Lee et al
as 5:2014cv00780
Defendant:
Donald G. Lee, James William Lee, Douglas William Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Abimael Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Perez v. Radford Quarries of Boone, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00080
Defendant:
Radford Quarries of Boone, Inc., Danny J. Cecile, Raymond S. Cecile and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0801
Elliott v. Rollins, et al
as 5:2011cv00693
Plaintiff:
Claudia D. Elliott
Defendant:
Larry Rollins and Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Campbell v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00424
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Campbell
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and Enterprise Leasing Company-Southeast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
