Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. LGH Digital Media, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06940
Defendant: LGH DIGITAL MEDIA, INC., a California corporation doing business as LARSON STUDIOS, also doing business as A.R.L. STUDIOS, INC., a California corporation, LGH Digital Media, Inc. and LGH Digital Media, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Larson Studios doing business as A.R.L. Studios, Inc. a California Corporation
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, Board of Directors of Motion Picture Industry Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. Gregory A. Anderson
as 2:2019cv06296
Defendant: GREGORY A. ANDERSON, aka GREG ANDERSON, individually and doing business as THE TRANSFER FILM, LLC. and doing business as DESERT PALM PRODUCTIONS, Gregory A. Anderson, Greg Anderson and others
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. BTW Productions, Inc.
as 1:2019cv06495
Defendant: BTW Productions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan and Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. March On Productions, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05885
Plaintiff: Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan
Defendant: March On Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al. v. King Kong Production Vehicles, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04830
Defendant: KING KONG PRODUCTION VEHICLES, INC., a California corporation and King Kong Production Vehicles, Inc.
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Pictures of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. Supervising Sound Editors, Inc.
as 2:2019cv04365
Defendant: SUPERVISING SOUND EDITORS, INC., a suspended California corporation and Supervising Sound Editors, Inc.
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan v. Acme Smith, LLC
as 2:2018cv09532
Defendant: ACME-SMITH, LLC, a suspended California limited liability company and Acme Smith, LLC
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, Board of Directors of Motion Picture Industry Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, et al v. Samiah Signs, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv09295
Defendant: SAMIAH SIGNS, INC., a California corporation and Samiah Signs, Inc.
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. Georgia Film Fund One, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv07325
Defendant: Georgia Film Fund One, LLC, Georgia Film Fund Two, LLC, Randall Emmett / George Furla Productions, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Directors of the Motion Picture Pension Plan and Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan and Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. The Coalition Group, LLC
as 2:2018cv06625
Defendant: THE COALITION GROUP, LLC, a California limited liability company and The Coalition Group, LLC
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, Board of Directors of Motion Picture Industry Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?