Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Charles Adam Jones v. Amicizia Events, Inc.
as 2:2019cv08181
Defendant:
Amicizia Events, Inc., DOES 1-10, inclusive and Jennifer McLaughlin
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Jennifer Bawcum v. Dynamic Forces, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06694
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bawcum
Defendant:
Dynamic Entertainment, Dynamic Forces, Inc. and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Diane Blackman et al v. Teespring, Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01494
Defendant:
Teespring, Inc. and Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Olivier Delmas, David Olenick, Alan Pirie and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sergey Grishin v. Jennifer Sulkess
as 2:2018cv10179
Defendant:
Jennifer Sulkess and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Sergey Grishin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Diane Blackman et al v. Teespring, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv08357
Plaintiff:
Olivier Delmas, David Olenick, Alan Pirie and others
Defendant:
Teespring, Inc and Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tropical Textile, Inc. v. J and S, LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv03989
Plaintiff:
TROPICAL TEXTILE, INC.
Defendant:
J&S, LLC., SHOPTIQUES, INC., JENNIFER O'ROURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOANNE FABRIC, INC. v. MARIGOLD FASHION, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06854
Defendant:
THE DRESS BARN, INC., BRAD & ZOE, INC., PAPERDOLL WHOLESALE and others
Plaintiff:
JOANNE FABRIC, INC. and TROPICAL TEXTILE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Elohim EPF USA, Inc. v. Karaoke Phoenix Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00630
Defendant:
Jennifer Bittel, Degolmok, Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Elohim EPF USA, Inc.
Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08016
Defendant:
Does, Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly
Rondinelli Reilly v. San Francisco Urban Adventure Club et al
as 3:2016cv04057
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly
Defendant:
San Francisco Urban Adventure Club and Andrew Huang
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
