Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated v. Particle Media, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00032
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 10 and Particle Media, Inc. d/b/a News Break
Plaintiff:
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Miller
as 3:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
John T. Miller
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Sartin et al
as 3:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Mitzi Sartin and John Does Numbers 1 through 99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Zuffa, LLC v. Shurden et al
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
John M. Shurden, Angela R. Shurden and Gemini Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Wells
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
John W. Wells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Cox et al
as 1:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
James B. Cox, Catherine A. Cox, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Strickland v. Winfrey et al
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Otisa C. Strickland
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey, Harpo Studios and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Handshoe v. Perret et al
as 1:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Douglas Handshoe
Defendant:
Vaughn Perret, Charles Leary, Daniel Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Turkoyz, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00734
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Turkoyz, Inc., Alan Weeks, Fran Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Willis et al
as 3:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Amber Willis and John Does Numbers 1 through 99
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
