Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated v. Particle Media, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00032
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 10 and Particle Media, Inc. d/b/a News Break
Plaintiff:
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strickland v. Winfrey et al
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Otisa C. Strickland
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey, Harpo Studios and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Handshoe v. Perret et al
as 1:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Douglas Handshoe
Defendant:
Vaughn Perret, Charles Leary, Daniel Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Turkoyz, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00734
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Turkoyz, Inc., Alan Weeks, Fran Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
D C General Contractors, Inc. v. Sanders et al
as 2:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
D C General Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Hugh Sanders , Dennis Pierce, Inc. and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Goldsberry v. Trinity University Press et al
as 3:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
Leon Goldsberry
Defendant:
Trinity University Press , Vaughn Sills and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Pop's Dream Music et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Pop's Dream Music, Mo' Berries, Dalf Music Company and others
Defendant:
Malaco, Inc., Malaco Records, Chatawa Music and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blackberry Records, Inc. et al v. Malaco, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00679
Plaintiff:
Blackberry Records, Inc. and Marxan Records, Inc.
Defendant:
Malaco, Inc., Malaco Records, Malaco Productions and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCullough v. Owens Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00527
Plaintiff:
Michael McCullough and Michael McCullough
Defendant:
Owens Enterprises, Inc. and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
