Cases 61 - 70 of 1,091
Wepay Global Payments LLC v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 2:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Wepay Global Payments LLC
Defendant:
PNC Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VALYRIAN IP LLC v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
VALYRIAN IP LLC
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NITETEK LICENSING LLC v. ADS CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
NITETEK LICENSING LLC
Defendant:
ADS CORPORATION D/B/A ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES and ADS CORPORATION doing business as ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NITETEK LICENSING LLC v. TENNANT COMPANY
as 5:2022cv01216
Plaintiff:
NITETEK LICENSING LLC
Defendant:
TENNANT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SAMPSON v. SOKOL
as 2:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E SAMPSON
Defendant:
MARK SOKOL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
EASTWOOD AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC v. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC.
as 2:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
EASTWOOD AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VENDISTO LLC v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.
as 2:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
VENDISTO LLC
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NITETEK LICENSING LLC v. TENNANT COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01216
Plaintiff:
NITETEK LICENSING LLC
Defendant:
TENNANT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORP. et al v. TESTO, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORP. and PARKER INTANGIBLES, LLC
Defendant:
TESTO, INC., TESTO SE & CO. KGaA and TESTO NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
LIU v. FOUJOY et al
as 2:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
CHUANQI LIU
Defendant:
FOUJOY, YBEKI, LINGMAI and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
