Cases 81 - 90 of 1,091
DALE v. SAFOCO, INC.
as 1:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON DALE
Defendant:
SAFOCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC v. GRECIA
as 2:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
WILLIAM GRECIA and GRECIA ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MCS Industries Inc. v. ALDI INC.
as 2:2021cv03828
Plaintiff:
MCS Industries Inc.
Defendant:
ALDI INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
LEDCOMM LLC v. WESTINGHOUSE LIGHTING CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv03208
Plaintiff:
LEDCOMM LLC
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE LIGHTING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Display Technologies, LLC v. OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS
as 5:2021cv03502
Plaintiff:
Display Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Display Technologies, LLC v. OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS
as 2:2021cv03502
Plaintiff:
Display Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Display Technologies, LLC
as 2:2021cv03390
Lead Plaintiff:
Display Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF AMERICAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
STEWART v. BOEING CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
CHARLES STEWART
Defendant:
BOEING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
SONICBLUE AEROSPACE, INC. v. ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC et al
as 3:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
SONICBLUE AEROSPACE, INC.
Defendant:
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC, ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BLUE SPIKE LLC et al v. SERVICE ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 5:2021cv03063
Plaintiff:
BLUE SPIKE LLC, BLUE SPIKE INTERNATIONAL LTD. and WISTARIA TRADING LTD.
Defendant:
SERVICE ELECTRIC COMPANY, SERVICE ELECTRIC TELEVISION, INC., SERVICE ELECTRIC CABLE T.V., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
