Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01675
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Yue et al v. Hanna et al
as 1:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Huizhoushi Huifangyuan Nong Keji Youxian Gongsi a/k/a Botail, yidiandian Shenzhen wenhuachuanmeiyouxiangongsi a/k/a Cool Essential and Wenyong Yue
Counter-Defendant:
Huizhoushi Huifangyuan Nong Keji Youxian Gongsi a/k/a Botail, yidiandian Shenzhen wenhuachuanmeiyouxiangongsi a/k/a Cool Essential and Wenyong Yue
Defendant:
Reaction Labs LLC a/k/a Lup and John Nashed Hanna
Counter-Plaintiff:
Reaction Labs LLC a/k/a Lup
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
La Jolla Pharma, LLC v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
La Jolla Pharma, LLC
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01438
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Non-Infringement- Right to Compensation
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01370
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01107
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Yue et al v. Hanna et al
as 1:2024cv04579
Plaintiff:
yidiandian Shenzhen wenhuachuanmeiyouxiangongsi a/k/a Cool Essential, Wenyong Yue and Huizhoushi Huifangyuan Nong Keji Youxian Gongsi a/k/a Botail
Defendant:
Reaction Labs LLC a/k/a Lup and John Nashed Hanna
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
