Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Seagen Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
as 2:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Seagen Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and Shane A Nelson
Intervenor Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Limited
Petitioner:
Non-Party The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gemmy Industries Corporation v. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP et al
as 3:2010cv02315
Plaintiff:
Gemmy Industries Corporation
Defendant:
Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP , Monty Ross and Mark Backofen
Thirdparty_defendant:
Anderson & Byrd LLP and James G Flaherty
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Monty Ross , Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP and Mark Backofen
Counter_claimant:
Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP
Counter_defendant:
Gemmy Industries Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Light Transformation Technologies LLC v. Anderson Custom Electronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
Light Transformation Technologies LLC, Light Transformation Technologies LLC and Light Transformation Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Anderson Custom Electronics, Inc., Dialight Corporation, Digi-Key Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Brown v. Baylor Health Care System et al
as 4:2008cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jack Brown
Defendant:
Baylor Health Care System, Children's Medical Center Of Dallas, IASIS Healthcare L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Atser Research Technologies, Inc. v. Raba-Kistner Consultants Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00093
Plaintiff:
Atser Research Technologies, Inc., Atser Research Technologies, Inc., Atser Research Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Raba-Kistner Consultants Inc, Raba-Kistner Consultants Inc, Raba-Kistner Consultants Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
