Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Solofill LLC v. Sommers et al
as 2:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Solofill LLC
Defendant:
Laura J Sommers and John F Kruger, Jr
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
O'Brien v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2019cv01625
Plaintiff:
Royal O'Brien and Royal J O'Brien
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Baker v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Richard J Baker
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation , Ubisoft, Inc. , Nintendo of America, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Microsoft Corporation , Electronic Arts Inc and Nintendo of America, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Richard J Baker
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Krausz Industries, Ltd. v. Romac Industries, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01204
Plaintiff:
Krausz Industries, Ltd.
Defendant:
Romac Industries, Inc. and Everett J. Prescott, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Romac Industries, Inc. and Everett J. Prescott, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Krausz Industries, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
J & E Hynds LLC v. Hopscotch Technology Inc
as 3:2008cv05083
Plaintiff:
J & E Hynds LLC and J & E Hynds LLC
Defendant:
Hopscotch Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Laughing Rabbit Inc v. J&S Marketing LLC
as 2:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Laughing Rabbit Inc and Laughing Rabbit Inc
Defendant:
J&S Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DX/DY Voice Processing, Inc. v. Teligence Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
DX/DY Voice Processing, Inc. and DX/DY Voice Processing, Inc.
Defendant:
Teligence Corporation, Teligence Corporation, Teligence Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Teligence Corporation, Teligence Corporation, Teligence Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
Jeffrey Smith, DX/DY Voice Processing, Inc., DX/DY Voice Processing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
