Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Tomy International, Inc. v. Mayborn USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tomy International, Inc.
Defendant:
Mayborn USA, Inc and Mayborn Group Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Belparts, N.V. v. Belimo Holding, A.G. et al
as 3:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
Belparts, N.V.
Defendant:
Belimo Holding, A.G., Belimo Aircontrols (USA), Inc and Belimo Automation AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
LILLEbaby, LLC v. Columbus Trading Partners USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00329
Plaintiff:
LILLEBaby, LLC
Defendant:
CYBEX GMBH and COLUMBUS TRADING PARTNERS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hologic, Inc. v. FUJIFILM Med Sys USA Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01056
Plaintiff:
Hologic, Inc.
Defendant:
FUJIFILM Med Sys USA Inc , FUJIFILM Corp and FUJIFILM Techno Products Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chapco, Inc. et al v. Woodway USA, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01665
Plaintiff:
Chapco, Inc. and Samsara, LLC
Defendant:
Woodway USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Protegrity Corporation et al v. Adallom, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01160
Plaintiff:
Protegrity Corporation and Protegrity USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Adallom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Huang v. Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
as 3:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Han-Ching Huang
Defendant:
Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Huang v. Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
as 2:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Han-Huang Huang
Defendant:
Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Eveready Battery Co Inc et al v. Dorco USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Eveready Battery Co Inc and Schick Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Dorco USA, Inc. and Pace Shave
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Protegrity USA, Inc. et al v. Netskope, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Protegrity USA, Inc. and Protegrity Corporation
Defendant:
Netskope, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
