Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Holy Donut, Inc. v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv02200
Defendant:
Michelle Natina Moore an individual d/b/a Holey Donut, The Doughnut Hole Limited Liability Company, Christopher Aaron Newton an individual d/b/a Holey Donut and others
Plaintiff:
The Holey Donut, Inc., Holey Donut, Inc. and Holy Donut, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Eat Me Lures Inc. v. Cafepress LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01406
Defendant:
Phillip Millner, Fred E. Durham, Robert D. Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Eat Me Lures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Ganete Solutions, Inc. v Software Technology Group, Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Does 1 to 25 and Software Technology Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ganete Solutions, Inc. d/b/a ArmorerLink and Ganete Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Adidas America, Inc. et al v. Forever 21, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
Adidas AG, Adidas International Marketing B.V. and Adidas America, Inc.
Defendant:
O & K Inc., Salt & Pepper Clothing, Inc., Famma Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Duboff v. University of Chicago et al
as 3:2013cv00436
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Duboff
Defendant:
Bryan A. Garner, Lawprose, Inc. and University of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Bryan et al v. CFA Institute
as 3:2010cv01013
Plaintiff:
John D. Bryan and Martha J. Byran
Defendant:
CFA Institute
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chevron U. S. A., Inc. v. Higgins et al
as 6:2009cv06149
Plaintiff:
Chevron U. S. A., Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy D. Higgins, Victoria A. M. Higgins, Steven L. Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. D&H Texaco, Inc.
as 6:2007cv06046
Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
D&H Texaco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
