Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Stein v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05934
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge, M.D. and others
Wang v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06031
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge, M.D. and others
Mohamed Chbani v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06432
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Chbani
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Michael F. Giordano, Pablo Legorreta and others
Jadlow v. Danker et al
as 1:2022cv06290
Plaintiff:
Todd Jadlow
Defendant:
Timothy R Danker, Raffaele Sadun, Donald Britton and others
Wilson v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Kenneth Bate, Roy A. Beveridge and others
Johnson v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06294
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Grant Bogle, David M. Mott and others
Jadlow v. Danker et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Todd Jadlow
Defendant:
Timothy R Danker, Raffaele Sadun, Donald Britton and others
Nominal Defendant:
SelectQuote, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carter
as 1:2021mi00059
Respondent:
Grant M. Carter
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 80 Investment Companies and Advisers
In re American Capital Realties Litigation
as 1:2015cv00421
Defendant:
American Capital Realties Litigation, American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., Arc Properties Operating Partnership L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, College Retirement Equities Fund, Tiaa-Cref Equity Index Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Feierstein v. Correvio Pharma Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv11361
Defendant:
Correvio Pharma Corp., Mark H.N. Corrigan, William Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Feierstein
Lead Plaintiff:
Iuliia Mironova, Nabil Saad and Clinton Atkinson
Petitioner:
Luis Lopez Iglesias, Larry Dorman, Win Tang and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
