Cases 31 - 40 of 4,873
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Zaita v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
John Zaita
Defendant:
Juniper Networks, Inc., Rami Rahim, Anne DelSanto and others
S2 Growth I LLC v. Romulus Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10398
Plaintiff:
S2 Growth I LLC
Defendant:
Romulus Capital Management, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth III LP, Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Myra Lane
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Ballard v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
McDaniel v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
John McDaniel
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Miskey v. New York Community Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Dale Miskey
Defendant:
New York Community Bancorp, Inc., Thomas Robert Cangemi and John J. Pinto
Petitioner:
Boston Retirement System and Sand Hollow Management, LLC
M&N Trading LLC v. BofA Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
M&N Trading LLC
Defendant:
BofA Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Carroll v. Ambrx Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
John Carroll
Defendant:
Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Stephen Glover, Daniel O'Connor and others
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System v. Xponential Fitness, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Xponential Fitness, Inc., Anthony Geisler and John Meloun
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
