Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Quinones v. Frequency Therapeutics, Inc., et al
as 23-1393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIAN QUINONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
PAUL EVANS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and MICHAEL HINGSTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
FREQUENCY THERAPEUTICS, INC., DAVID L. LUCCHINO and CARL LEBEL
Interested Party:
PARAG PATEL and JOHN PRATT
Berezin v. Croskrey et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berezin
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Richard Hendrix and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
Raul v. SPX Flow, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01404
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Defendant:
SPX Flow, Inc., Robert Hull, Majdi Abulaban and others
Walker v. SPX FLOW, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Adam Walker
Defendant:
SPX FLOW, Inc., Madji B. Abulaban, Anne K. Altman and others
Murray v. SPX Flow, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Brian Murray
Defendant:
SPX Flow, Inc., Marcus G. Michael, Majdi B. Abulaban and others
WATERMAN v. SPX FLOW, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
SPX FLOW, INC., ROBERT HULL, MAJDI ABULABAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud
Wilson v. SPX FLOW, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
SPX FLOW, Inc., Majdi B. Abulaban, Anne K. Altman and others
Ciccotelli v. SPX Flow, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
SPX Flow, Inc., Robert Hull, Majdi Abulaban and others
O'Dell v. SPX Flow, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
SPX Flow, Inc., Marcus G. Michael, Robert F. Hull, Jr. and others
Perri v. Stephen E. Croskrey et al.
as 1:2021cv01423
Plaintiff:
Ryan Perri
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Christy Basco and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
