Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,679
Albaugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Michelle M. Albaugh
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HUNTER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff: GRACE V. HUNTER
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SPARKMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: ERIC R. SPARKMAN
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff: Doris Hall
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: THOMAS MILLER
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KENNEDY et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff: TYLER JOSEPH KENNEDY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KENNEDY v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff: TYLER JOSEPH KENNEDY
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BEDWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: REBECCA J. BEDWELL
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WHITE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: RENEE LYNN WHITE
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Jacob L. Jones and Jacob L Jones
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?