Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2010cv00463
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Demethia A Hill
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Thomas v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv03250
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Nichole L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Norton v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03244
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Norton
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Adsit v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv05017
Plaintiff:
Grace Adsit
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Roberts v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03208
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Loren D Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kermoade v. Astrue
as 8:2010cv00396
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Cindy Kermoade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Nelson v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03197
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Christina Ladon Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ponce
as 4:2010cv03188
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Sandra E Ponce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Whyte v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03181
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Amy L Whyte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dofner v. Astrue
as 8:2010cv00321
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Harry K. Dofner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.