Cases 61 - 70 of 498
HAYNES v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00404
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
MYRA HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PALMISANO v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00330
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER PALMISANO
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GANDER v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv00300
Plaintiff:
LAURIE IRENE GANDER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FUENTES v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv06151
Plaintiff:
ANA FUENTES
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
REILLY v. SAUL
as 5:2019cv06089
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN REILLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KAMARA v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05997
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAMARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EDELHEIT v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv06000
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
CLARISSA EDELHEIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FURBER v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05998
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
AUDREY FURBER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ELLIOTT v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05999
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MELVENIA ELLIOTT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROSE v. UNKOWN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENT et al
as 5:2019cv06018
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW C. LYNCH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
