Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KING v KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff: RONNIE KING
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party: SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KING v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01008
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: HUBERT KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
KING v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00377
Plaintiff: DONNA R KING
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
KING v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00323
Plaintiff: ALETA GAYLENE KING
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00001
Plaintiff: Josephine M. King
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00589
Plaintiff: Courtney King
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
King v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00058
Plaintiff: George Thomas King
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
King v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2017cv00149
Plaintiff: Avonda King
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
King v. Berryhill
as 7:2017cv00108
Plaintiff: Keith J. King
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
King v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00145
Plaintiff: Karena A. King
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?