Cases 1 - 10 of 234
BURNETTE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
ANGELA D. BURNETTE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HATCHER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
NICOLE D. HATCHER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DICKERSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. DICKERSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE D. JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
STILTS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
SHANE D. STILTS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hilton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Hilton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Burnette v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
John D. Burnette, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HERSBERGER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN D. HERSBERGER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
POYNER v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
APRIL D. POYNER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON-KENDRICK v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02100
Plaintiff:
SANDRA D JOHNSON-KENDRICK and SANDRA D. JOHNSON-KENDRICK
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
