Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Riggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00055
Plaintiff: Lauren K. Riggs
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PLAYER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff: JESSICA K. PLAYER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Allen v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00063
Plaintiff: Angela K Allen
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Dixon v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00128
Plaintiff: James K Dixon
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LOWE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00742
Plaintiff: MARTY K. LOWE
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Knowles v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00039
Plaintiff: Mary K. Knowles
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Morrow v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00020
Plaintiff: Sammy K. Morrow
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hughes v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00253
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Yevette K. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Shook v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00105
Plaintiff: Donna K. Shook
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nichols v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2015cv00197
Plaintiff: Lisa K. Nichols
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?